Federal Charges Require Federal Defense Experience

Testimonial – Criminal Law Attorney Video

http://www.robertslawteam.com 866-630-2389 The biggest strength of Roberts Law Group is honesty. Attorney Roberts goes by the facts. A former client is 100 percent satisfied with the Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense attorney.

Raleigh, North Carolina, Federal Charge Criminal Defense Lawyer

Criminal charges in federal court mean facing an entirely different criminal justice system. Your attorney will need to understand the various rules relating to grand jury indictments, evidence discovery and deadlines for filing legal motions. Not every criminal defense law firm is equipped to handle federal charges. Even when a criminal defense law firm says it is qualified, talk to them about experience. In federal court, it makes a difference, from the beginning of your case to the end.

If you have been charged in federal court, contact us to discuss the nature of your case. We will give you a clear explanation of the federal mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines and what to expect. If you hire us to defend you, we will work aggressively to help you protect your rights.

Does Your Case Belong In Federal Court?

Whenever possible, we fight to have your felony charges reduced to a misdemeanor and returned to the state criminal justice system.

We have Raleigh criminal defense trial experience handling cases such as:

Roberts Law Group, PLLC has the professional resources to handle complex cases of drug crimes and sex offenses in North Carolina's federal courts. As a former prosecutor, attorney Patrick Roberts has been involved in hundreds of felony cases, including federal charges.

Prosecutor Experience, By Your Side And At Your Service

Contact us right away. Give us every opportunity to start an aggressive defense as soon as possible.

U.S. vs. J.R.
Charge: Mail Fraud (9 Counts), Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
Facing: Three years in prison
Result: One year, One day

Our client was convicted of nine counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. The government alleged that our client fraudulently obtained more than $115,000 from her former employer. At the sentencing hearing, the Judge granted our motion for a downward departure, sentencing our client to one year and one day. The government had asked the judge to sentence our client to several years.